Logo

Theological Editions - Indepth daily religious news, views, reviews & key theological resources
Features

In-depth religious news, views, reviews, features & resources for the thinking person
 

Resources

Bible
Sermons

Liturgy & Prayer

News & Magazines

Journals

Texts & Resources

Home


Da Vinci Code unlocks controversy
by Graeme J. Davidson, 17 September 2005

Dan Brown is more interested in spinning a yarn that sells than bothering to get facts right. In this, he has been highly successful.

Dan Brown welcomes the controversy generated by his blockbuster, The Da Vinci Code. “Religion”, he says, “has only one true enemy – apathy – and passionate debate is a superb antidote”.

Brown, a former English teacher, has reason to rejoice. The controversy, along with vigorous marketing, has turned his religious thriller into the fastest selling adult novel ever – over 30 million copies in two years. It has spent months at the top of bestseller lists around the globe, including New Zealand, earning Brown an estimated US$76.5 million in royalties in one year alone.

There’s an upmarket illustrated version and special tours to sites mentioned in the book. You need to sign up a month in advance to see the original Da Vinci fresco of the Last Supper on the refectory wall at the Convent of Santa Maria in Milan. The tiny Rosslyn Chapel near Edinburgh in Scotland has tripled its visitors – and its coffers at £6 a head.

The Da Vinci Code is a fast-paced action story that combines history with modern issues. It also attempts to reveal the human side of Jesus Christ from under the debris of organised religion.

The book’s mixture of art history, religious symbolism, code-breaking, conspiracy, secret societies and cultic practices – including masochism and ritual sex – brings the esoteric into the mainstream.

Even some who stick a knife into Brown for serving up a heady brew of misinformation and half-truths claim it’s ‘a good read – as long as you treat it as pure fantasy’. Others would only recommend it to their enemies.

There are parodies and copycat versions – along with hundreds of articles and nine books debunking The Da Vinci Code. Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone expressed a common concern when he said there was “a very real risk that many people who read it will believe that the fables it contains are true”.

The film version staring Tom Hanks, scheduled for release May 2006, is already creating waves that have forced director Ron Howard to consult a Catholic theologian on changes to avoid a thumbs-down from the potentially huge Catholic audience.

Westminster Abbey rejected a request to film there, so the crew, along with their reputed £180,000 donation, moved to Lincoln Cathedral.

In answer to those who accused that Cathedral of selling out for an inflation-adjusted 30 pieces of silver, the Dean, the Very Rev. Alec Knight, preached to a divided congregation that, even though The Da Vinci Code is speculative and far-fetched, it “stimulates debate and the search for truth”.

Brown claims his book “is a novel and, therefore, a work of fiction”. Nevertheless, on the first page he provides a list of ‘facts’, suggesting that much of what he wrote is true. This has left many wondering why they didn’t hear these exciting things at Sunday school.

In a rare interview for the National Geographic Channel, Dan Brown reaffirmed his belief in the book’s theme – that Jesus was married to one of his camp followers, Mary Magdalene, and that he had children by her.

This bloodline – not the chalice of the Last Supper – is the Holy Grail, according to Brown. In support of this view, he points to Gnostic texts, written in the early days of Christianity, and blames the male-dominated Church for declaring them heretical.

Brown also argues that all Jewish men married in Jesus’ time, therefore Jesus must have been married. Not so. St. Paul and about 4000 Essene monks at Qumran beside the Dead Sea were single and celibate.

Mary Magdalene is mentioned 12 times in the New Testament, 11 times during the crucifixion and resurrection. In the twelfth instance, she is one of several women out of whom Jesus cast evil spirits.

In Gnostic writings, she is a close confidant of Jesus. But even in these fanciful texts, there is no hint of sexual intimacy.

Brown’s view that Jesus was thought of as purely human until the Council of Nicea in 325 AD is wrong. A strong belief in Jesus’ divinity is at the heart of the earliest Christian writings. The Council of Nicea under Emperor Constantine decided on the nature of this divinity, not whether he was divine.

Despite Brown’s claims, there is no Christian text or mention of Jesus in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

The book’s villain, the albino Opus Dei monk, Silas, is wide of the mark. Opus Dei is not a religious order of monks, but a Catholic lay movement designed to inspire holiness.

The book’s hero who cracks the code is Robert Langdon, Professor of Religious Symbology at Harvard University. Langdon must have cheated in his exams and created a fictitious CV to get that job. In real life, he wouldn’t pass Religion 101.

Dan Brown is more interested in spinning a yarn that sells than bothering to get facts right. In this, he has been highly successful.

 


 

 

See also
Should we intervene to prevent suicide? >> more
Divorce risk indicator >> more
When you feel like you're sharing a bed with a stranger >> more
Surving the breakup >> more
Suicide terrorism as a desperate weapon of liberation >> more
Ned Flanders — popular face of Christianity >> more
Seven common myths about religion >> more
Moral divide between church leaders and laity >> more
Unholy silence over MPs hypocrisy and greed >> more
Anglican schism over gay clergy inevitable >> more
My agonising path to enlightenment >> more
More than ever, it's a time for generosity >> more
National's ethics smell of political expediency >> more
Pope's trip to Holy Land fraught with potholes >> more
The resurrection may have been superfluous >> more
Rasputin — from sinner and seducer to saint? >> more
Religious delusions and the Jerusalem syndrome >> more
Protest mild compared with Jesus' vandalism >> more
What Castro and Obama have in common >> more
Holidays can revive romance or widen cracks between couples >> more
Dubious scholarship reinterprets Jesus to fit secular creed >> more
Furore over gay marriage echoes the conflict over slavery >> more
If only politics were as certain as dear old granny >> more
You've got to have faith to win the White House >> more
The problem of evil >> more
TV Programmers let lose Roman circus >> more
Prostitutes welcome in the kingdom of God but not in Dannevirke >> more
Church too busy navel-gazing to take lead over crime >> more
Will the Anglican Church split over gay clergy and same-sex unions? >> more
Faith in secular western society >> more
The Vatican's pelvic theology >> more
Abuse and the Beijing Olympics >> more
Would the real Jesus stand up? >> more
Hypersensitivity perverts ethics >> more
God and presidential hopefuls >> more
A three-ghetto church based on politics >> more
Good and bad intentions >> more
Deliver us from exorcists who harm >> more
How effective is prayer? >> more
Masters of non-violence, resistance and kung fu >> more
Was Mother Teresa living a lie? >> more
Double standards over child sex abuse >> more
Soppy inspirational and pseudo-spiritual emails >> more
Caring organisations and pyschopathic bosses >> more
The new anti-religious evangelists >> more
Call for religious education could backfire >> more
Blessing creatures great & small — but what about blowflies? >> more
Does God exist only in the brain? >> more
The Prudes who crucify >> more
tomb raiders and the bones of Jesus and his family? >> more
Jesus loves Osama >> more
Is God more like a matchbox or a number? >> more
Confessions of a failed axe murderer >> more
Bacchanalian festivals and sentimentality >> more
Manners: insignificant social customs? >> more
The 109 fighting boys >> more
Trying to exhume the historical Jesus >> more
Is global violence really on the increase? >> more
Polygamy, circumcision, atheist journalists and religious diversity >> more
The Christian Right stands by Israel out of a misguided theology  >> more 
What a rat taught me >> more
The Church is becoming a retirement hobby for granny clergy >> more 
Is there an anti-Christian conspiracy in Hollywood? >> more
Have church schools sold out on Christianity? >> more
How good a Christian is President George W Bush? >> more

Hitler, Lawyers, Politicians SUV owners and life after death >> more

Were the Christian hostages really idiots for peace? >> more
Infidelity: in hot pursuit of a better organsm or better intimacy? >> more
Skulduggery and controversy over discovery of religious texts >> more
The cartoons aren't about secular freedoms versus intolerance >> more

Christian Zionists hinder justice and peace in the Middle East >> more

Should making more money be your New Year's resolution? >> more
My early life as a black sheep in a nativity scene >> more
Different types of suicide bomber: what makes them tick >> more
Cheating a short cut to sucess in winner-take-all society >> more
Life after death: Is it logically possible? >> more
Is it Anglican to practise apartheid? >> more
Da Vinci Code unlocks controversy>> more
Bishops' statement: pompous, pious, out of touch and verging on the heretical >> more 
Church leaders unconvincing over prostitution law reform >> more
Divorce risk factors >> more
How global are we?  A Christian's view of globalisation >> more
Victims of dirty tricks & friendly fire: Machiavellian tactics in the Church militant >> more
A redundant resurrection >> more
War, violence, ethics, religion and hypocrisy >> more
If St Peter was interviewed for ordination today >> more
13 ways to empty a church without really trying >> more
How tolerant is the Museum of Tolerance? >> more
A church comes out and reconciliation divides >> more
Micah's dream — too much to ask? >> more
Has the revised Anglican Church in New Zealand instigated a benign form of religious apartheid? >> more
The case for St Judas Iscariot >> more
Exorcism: the ministry of deliverance >> more

Top