Logo

Theological Editions - Indepth daily religious news, views, reviews & key theological resources
Features

In-depth religious news, views, reviews, features & resources for the thinking person
 

Resources

Bible
Sermons

Liturgy & Prayer

News & Magazines

Journals

Texts & Resources

Home

Trying to exhume the historical Jesus from under 2000 years of faith
by Graeme J. Davidson,
21 October 2006

While it seems bizarre that a bunch of academics would use the ballot box to help decide historical truth, at least they’re living up to Napoleon Bonaparte’s view that “history is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon".

....Watch a classic movie set in ancient times, like Ben Hur, and you’ll soon realise it says more about the era the film was made than ancient history. Does that mean, then, that any attempt to exhume the historical Jesus from under 2000 years of devotion and Church doctrine is going to say more about modern attitudes than it will about the historical Jesus?
....A theologian friend discussed this question with me as he was deciding whether to join a team of liberal biblical scholars sponsored by the Westar Institute in Santa Rosa, California. Dubbed the Jesus Seminar, the group aims to unearth the historical Jesus from the Church’s Christ of faith.
....“How do we decide what Jesus said and did when New Testament times are so different from ours?” I asked my friend, “For instance, did Jesus really tell his disciples to buy swords, as recorded in Luke’s Gospel? If this is what Jesus said, it doesn’t read like one of his metaphors or fit with our idea of him as Prince of Peace. Maybe he originally taught violent revolution or expected his followers to defend themselves? Or did the writer put the words into Jesus’ mouth decades later?”
....My friend assured me that questions like these would face biblical analysis and public debate among Seminar scholars. They would then vote by casting coloured beads in a box. A red bead, indicating what Jesus almost certainly said, is worth 3 points. A pink one, worth 2 points, is for what he probably said. A grey bead of 1 point signifies he didn’t say it but it contained something of his ideas, and a black bead, worth zero, is for something that Jesus didn’t say as it belongs to a different or later tradition.
....While it seems bizarre that a bunch of academics would use the ballot box to help decide historical truth, at least they’re living up to Napoleon Bonaparte’s view that “history is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon". A group of more conservative theologians using the coloured beads would undoubtedly vote for a different version of past events.
....My friend didn’t join the Jesus Seminar. He decided its members had a secular mindset and their approach to scholarship was outdated.
....Seminar members assume the gospels aren’t based on eyewitness accounts and, therefore, aren’t accurate historical records. Instead, they believe the Scriptures were ghost-written and promote the beliefs of their writers. They also claim that the Church in the Fourth Century selected books for the New Testament that were in common use and supported Church thinking. To help rectify this, the Seminar has included the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas as a fifth gospel.
....Members have voted with enough red and pink beads to suggest that Jesus probably said about 18 percent of the words attributed to him. They believe the instruction to buy swords is possibly authentic but that Jesus’ claims of divinity and Messiahship, along with nearly all of his words in John’s Gospel, are unlikely to have come from his lips.
....Similarly, Jesus Seminar members think that Jesus may have healed people in the same way modern faith healers do but that most gospel miracles didn’t occur. Walking on water, raising the dead, casting out demons, feeding thousands with a few loaves and fishes – and Jesus’ virgin birth and bodily resurrection – are viewed as myth.
....The liberal media welcomes this intellectualism as it demythologises Christianity and reduces it to secular humanism. Two Kiwi members, Lloyd Geering and James Veitch, have certainly had wide exposure on Radio New Zealand in preference to other biblical scholars.
....The Jesus Seminar has also influenced The Sea of Faith Network, of which Lloyd Geering is a life member. The Seminar is criticised for its secular dogmatism, which has attracted very few top biblical scholars among its current 128 fellows, and for an outmoded approach to biblical scholarship. ....Members are also accused of having insufficient understanding of the theological and philosophical thinking of Jesus’ time and for going out of their way to oppose biblical literalists to the detriment of orthodox Christian views.
....One of the world’s leading biblical scholars, Tom Wright, sums this up when he says, “The Jesus Seminar, in its desire to go public with the results of scholarship, has apparently been lured into giving the public what it wants, rather than what scholarship can in fact provide”.

 


 

 

See also
Should we intervene to prevent suicide? >> more
Divorce risk indicator >> more
When you feel like you're sharing a bed with a stranger >> more
Surving the breakup >> more
Suicide terrorism as a desperate weapon of liberation >> more
Ned Flanders — popular face of Christianity >> more
Seven common myths about religion >> more
Moral divide between church leaders and laity >> more
Unholy silence over MPs hypocrisy and greed >> more
Anglican schism over gay clergy inevitable >> more
My agonising path to enlightenment >> more
More than ever, it's a time for generosity >> more
National's ethics smell of political expediency >> more
Pope's trip to Holy Land fraught with potholes >> more
The resurrection may have been superfluous >> more
Rasputin — from sinner and seducer to saint? >> more
Religious delusions and the Jerusalem syndrome >> more
Protest mild compared with Jesus' vandalism >> more
What Castro and Obama have in common >> more
Holidays can revive romance or widen cracks between couples >> more
Dubious scholarship reinterprets Jesus to fit secular creed >> more
Furore over gay marriage echoes the conflict over slavery >> more
If only politics were as certain as dear old granny >> more
You've got to have faith to win the White House >> more
The problem of evil >> more
TV Programmers let lose Roman circus >> more
Prostitutes welcome in the kingdom of God but not in Dannevirke >> more
Church too busy navel-gazing to take lead over crime >> more
Will the Anglican Church split over gay clergy and same-sex unions? >> more
Faith in secular western society >> more
The Vatican's pelvic theology >> more
Abuse and the Beijing Olympics >> more
Would the real Jesus stand up? >> more
Hypersensitivity perverts ethics >> more
God and presidential hopefuls >> more
A three-ghetto church based on politics >> more
Good and bad intentions >> more
Deliver us from exorcists who harm >> more
How effective is prayer? >> more
Masters of non-violence, resistance and kung fu >> more
Was Mother Teresa living a lie? >> more
Double standards over child sex abuse >> more
Soppy inspirational and pseudo-spiritual emails >> more
Caring organisations and pyschopathic bosses >> more
The new anti-religious evangelists >> more
Call for religious education could backfire >> more
Blessing creatures great & small — but what about blowflies? >> more
Does God exist only in the brain? >> more
The Prudes who crucify >> more
tomb raiders and the bones of Jesus and his family? >> more
Jesus loves Osama >> more
Is God more like a matchbox or a number? >> more
Confessions of a failed axe murderer >> more
Bacchanalian festivals and sentimentality >> more
Manners: insignificant social customs? >> more
The 109 fighting boys >> more
Trying to exhume the historical Jesus >> more
Is global violence really on the increase? >> more
Polygamy, circumcision, atheist journalists and religious diversity >> more
The Christian Right stands by Israel out of a misguided theology  >> more 
What a rat taught me >> more
The Church is becoming a retirement hobby for granny clergy >> more 
Is there an anti-Christian conspiracy in Hollywood? >> more
Have church schools sold out on Christianity? >> more
How good a Christian is President George W Bush? >> more

Hitler, Lawyers, Politicians SUV owners and life after death >> more

Were the Christian hostages really idiots for peace? >> more
Infidelity: in hot pursuit of a better organsm or better intimacy? >> more
Skulduggery and controversy over discovery of religious texts >> more
The cartoons aren't about secular freedoms versus intolerance >> more

Christian Zionists hinder justice and peace in the Middle East >> more

Should making more money be your New Year's resolution? >> more
My early life as a black sheep in a nativity scene >> more
Different types of suicide bomber: what makes them tick >> more
Cheating a short cut to sucess in winner-take-all society >> more
Life after death: Is it logically possible? >> more
Is it Anglican to practise apartheid? >> more
Da Vinci Code unlocks controversy>> more
Bishops' statement: pompous, pious, out of touch and verging on the heretical >> more 
Church leaders unconvincing over prostitution law reform >> more
Divorce risk factors >> more
How global are we?  A Christian's view of globalisation >> more
Victims of dirty tricks & friendly fire: Machiavellian tactics in the Church militant >> more
A redundant resurrection >> more
War, violence, ethics, religion and hypocrisy >> more
If St Peter was interviewed for ordination today >> more
13 ways to empty a church without really trying >> more
How tolerant is the Museum of Tolerance? >> more
A church comes out and reconciliation divides >> more
Micah's dream — too much to ask? >> more
Has the revised Anglican Church in New Zealand instigated a benign form of religious apartheid? >> more
The case for St Judas Iscariot >> more
Exorcism: the ministry of deliverance >> more

Top