Home
Theological Editions (click to go to Home Page)

Features

Archeology
Bible
Ethics
Faiths
General
History
Humour
Journals

Leadership
Liturgy

News

Pastoral
Philosophy

Prayer

Reviews

Sermons
Study
Youth

Home
Features
Web Theology

Send comments or submissions to the editor.

Winners, politics, human rights abuses and the Beijing Olympics
by Graeme J. Davidson

Originally appeared in The Dominion Post Religion and Ethics column 19 April 2008

Politics is the lifeblood of the Olympics. Despite the Olympic Charter stating the Games are contests between individuals or teams “and not between countries,” athletes represent nations and rival political ideologies.

....Pierre de Coubertin, the founder of the modern Olympics, believed “the most important thing is not to win but to take part". In the 1920s, American sports writer Grantland Rice echoed this: “it’s not that you won or lost - but how you played the game". We use quotes like that when athletes lose.
.... But let’s face it, the Olympics aren’t really about playing or taking part. Remember Michael “Eddie the Eagle” Edwards, Britain’s amateur ski jumper at the 1988 Winter Olympics? The worse he did the more we loved him, but the authorities were not amused and upped the entrance requirements to eliminate such losers. To be consistent, why not change the Olympic motto of “swifter, higher, stronger" to that of 1950s American football coach Henry Sanders: “Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing"?
.... To help make the 2008 Games in August a winner for China, Beijing is repressing dissidents at home and trying to deflect protests over its human rights abuses by promoting the myth of a politics-free Olympics
.

.... Politics is the lifeblood of the Olympics. Despite the Olympic Charter stating the Games are contests between individuals or teams “and not between countries,” athletes represent nations and rival political ideologies. We want our athletes to step onto the winner’s podium in our national colours to the sound of our national anthem so that we, as a free democratic nation, can bask in their glory. That’s why government, business and other interest groups spend up large to promote elite athletes. Hitler used the 1936 Munich Olympics to showcase the Nazi belief in Aryan superiority, and the USA and the USSR vied for medal tallies to show who was the greatest during the Cold War.
.... That puts pressure on athletes to make winning the only thing, and if they win we worship them as demigods. And when they are caught cheating or fail miserably, they become pariahs. Greeks felt humiliated when their superheroes Costas Kenteris and Katerina Thanou failed to show for a drug test and then withdrew from the 2004 Athens Games. Her teammates – and the rest of Australia - were angry with Sally Robbins for stopping rowing during the final of the Women’s Eight.
.... The Olympic Charter bans any kind of “demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda”. Yet, Cathy Freeman was allowed to display the Aboriginal flag to highlight the plight of the Stolen Generations after she won at the 2000 Sydney Olympics. What if a Tibetan athlete displays a Tibetan flag at the Beijing Olympics to draw attention to a “stolen country”? We’d expect Chinese authorities to treat it as a security breach, punish him or her and blame the Dalai Lama.
.... To get the Games China promised improvements in human rights. Yet, when Jacques Rogge, president of the International Olympic Committee, reminded Beijing of this and added, “the events in Tibet are a matter of great concern to the IOC,” Beijing told him to keep politics out of the Games. Human Rights Watch says the Olympics have provoked a wave of oppression in China and that “over the past two decades, the Chinese government has chronically restricted basic freedoms, including those of association, expression, and religious practice”. Then, there are those who object to China’s role in the Darfur conflict, its support for the military rulers in Myanmar, as well as the brutal crackdown in Tibet.
.... Political boycotts of the Olympics are not new. African countries shunned the 1976 Montreal Games as a protest against our All Blacks playing rugby in apartheid South Africa. Western countries avoided the 1980 Moscow Games because of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and, four years later, Eastern Bloc countries retaliated against the Los Angeles Olympics.
.... Human rights groups have called on world leaders to protest China’s abuse of human rights by boycotting the opening ceremony in Beijing. Despite our free trade deal with China, let’s hope our leaders have the ethical conviction to stay away and that our athletes – and we – will wholeheartedly support them.

See also
TV Programmers let lose Roman circus >> more
Prostitutes welcome in the kingdom of God but not in Dannevirke >> more
Church too busy navel-gazing to take lead over crime >> more
Will the Anglican Church split over gay clergy and same-sex unions? >> more
There's a resevoir of faith in secular western society >> more
The Vatican's pelvic theology presents perverse and confusing ethics >> more
Winners, politics, human rights abuses and the Bejing Olympics >> more
Would the real Jesus please stand up so we can recognise you? >> more
Hypersensitivity perverts ethics and hardwon freedoms >> more
You've got to have God if you want to be President of the US >> more
A three-ghetto church based on politics rather than Christianity >> more
Water bottles, soup can, pigeons and good and bad intentions >> more

Deliver us from evil and exorcists who do more harm than good >> more

More people pray than go to church: but how effective is prayer? >> more
Buddhist monks — masters of non-violence, resistance and kung fu >> more
Was Mother Teresa living a lie to achieve immortality as a saint? >> more
Our fears fuel outrage and double standards over child sex abuse >> more
Spare me those soppy inspirational and pseudo-spiritual emails >> more
Caring organisations attract their share of psychopathic bosses >> more
The new anti-religious evangelists and their faith in science >> more
Interfaith conference call for religious education could backfire >> more
Blessing creatures great and small - but what about blowflies? >> more
Does God exist only in the brain's God spot and on the God gene? >> more
The prudes who want to crucify for want of a loincloth on a chocolate Jesus >> more
Have tomb raiders really found the bones of Jesus and his family? >> more
Jesus loves Osama, an agnostic bishop and other ideas that stick >> more
Why it matters whether God is more like a matchbox or a number >> more  
Confessions of a failed axe murderer who queried religious ethics >> more
Consumer-conscious kids, Bacchanalian festivals and sentimentality >> more
Manners: insignificant social customs at the outer orbit of ethics? >> more
The 109 fighting boys from the Mitchelltown School and District >> more
Trying to exhume the historical Jesus from under 2000 years of faith >> more
Is global violence on the increase? Don't be fooled by what you see on TV >> more
Polygamy, circumcision, atheist journalists and religious diversity >> more
The Christian right stands by Israel out of a misguided theology  >> more 
What a rat taught me about creating successful relationships >> more
Is the Church becoming a retirement hobby for granny clergy? >> more 
Is there an anti-christian conspiracy in Hollywood? >> more
How good a Christian is the devout President George W Bush? >> more
Have church schools sold out on Christianity for secular values? >> more 

Hitler, Lawyers, Politicians SUV owners and life after death >> more

Were the Christian hostages really idiots for peace? >> more
Infidelity: in hot pursuit of a better organsm or better intimacy? >> more
Skulduggery and controversy over discovery of religious texts >> more
The cartoons aren't about secular freedoms versus intolerance >> more

Christian Zionists hinder justice and peace in the Middle East >> more

Should making more money be your New Year's resolution? >> more
My early life as a black sheep in a nativity scene >> more
Different types of suicide bomber: what makes them tick >> more
Cheating a short cut to sucess in winner-take-all society >> more
Life after death: Is it logically possible? >> more
Is it Anglican to practise apartheid? >> more
Da Vinci Code unlocks controversy >> more
Bishops' statement: pompous, pious, out of touch and verging on the heretical >> more 
Church leaders unconvincing over prostitution law reform >> more
Divorce risk factors >> more
How global are we?  A Christian's view of globalisation >> more
Victims of dirty tricks & friendly fire: Machiavellian tactics in the Church militant >> more
A redundant resurrection >> more
War, violence, ethics, religion and hypocrisy >> more
If St Peter was interviewed for ordination today >> more
13 ways to empty a church without really trying >> more
How tolerant is the Museum of Tolerance? >> more
A church comes out and reconciliation divides >> more
Micah's dream — too much to ask? >> more
Has the revised Anglican Church in New Zealand instigated a benign form of religious apartheid? >> more
The case for St Judas Iscariot >> more
Exorcism: the ministry of deliverance >> more

 

Copyright ©2005
Graeme Davidson

Home