Logo

Theological Editions - Indepth daily religious news, views, reviews & key theological resources
Features

In-depth religious news, views, reviews, features & resources for the thinking person
 

Resources

Bible
Sermons

Liturgy & Prayer

News & Magazines

Journals

Texts & Resources

Home

Dubious scholarship reinterprets Jesus to fit secular creed
by Graeme J. Davidson,
6 December 2008

Yet some liberal and secular New Testament scholars believe scriptures like the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas or a possible lost source document known as Q that focus on Jesus’ sayings in a simple, direct style must be more historically authentic than other scripture. Why? Because that’s the theory that best fits these scholars’ secular take on religion.

.... Whenever I ask Christians to tell me about the church they belong to, no one waxes lyrical about stained glass windows, clergy or sermons. They lead with what they think their church believes and what it’s trying to achieve. And the first Christians were no different. They focused on the significance of Jesus’ life and death and how that affected humanity.
.... That’s why the very earliest Christian writings include statements about Jesus’ divinity, like the creed the infant church is already using which St Paul quotes in his letter to the Philippians around 25 years after Jesus’ death. It says that Jesus had the nature of God.
....The heated debates over Jesus’ divinity in the following centuries were about how to express that divinity, not whether he was divine.
....Yet some liberal and secular New Testament scholars believe scriptures like the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas or a possible lost source document known as Q that focus on Jesus’ sayings in a simple, direct style must be more historically authentic than other scripture. Why? Because that’s the theory that best fits these scholars’ secular take on religion. They claim the early Christians reinvented Jesus the man as a mythologized divine Christ who fitted their hopes and aspirations, especially when they wrote about him in the four gospels.
....That’s the line Ian Harris ran in his last Honest to God column (Nov 22). Harris draws on journalist and humanist Quaker David Boulton’s foray into Biblical scholarship in a book Who on earth was Jesus? Boulton previously edited Godless for God's Sake, a book of essays by non-theist Quakers. That’s a clue as to how he might view Jesus’ divinity.
....Harris says most scholars agree that the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke rely on an earlier document, the lost Q source. Not true. When I researched for a book I wrote about Q, I found hardly any modern scholars saying Mark copied from Q. Most said Mark was an original source and Matthew and Luke copied from Mark and then gave his writings their own spin.
.... Many suggest Matthew and Luke copied about 25 percent of their material from Q, which, if it existed (and some reputable scholars believe it didn’t), was written at approximately the same time as Mark’s Gospel. And Mark’s Gospel tells how Jesus told his disciples he was the Christ, or God’s Messiah, fulfilling a divine mission.
....Harris quotes Boulton on how scholars have used their forensic tools to examine mostly second century documents and how they offer little information on the historical Jesus. That’s because the first followers of the historical Jesus where more interested in telling others what he meant to them.
.... The first Christian writings are St Paul’s letters written around 16 to 30 years after Jesus’ death. Paul tells us how he met Jesus’ family and his close disciples. From these encounters and his own experiences, he tells readers why Jesus is important – how it is through faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ that humanity can attain salvation from God.
....The earliest copy of a Christian text we have, known as P52, dates back to the early second century. It contains four verses from John’s gospel. But, like all our biblical documents, it’s a copy of earlier copies. There may well have been texts with Jesus’ sayings in circulation in the first century. But to claim that no-longer existing texts which some scholars think they can detect in the gospels are historically more authentic than the earliest writings about what Jesus and his first followers said about his divinity and godly mission requires one giant leap of dubious scholarly faith.
....Sure, the gospels are written with this Jesus is God mindset. Even the two stories of Jesus’ birth are there to illustrate that God came amongst us. But gospel writers aren’t the only ones with a particular religious mindset. It seems secular theologians want to reinterpret and diminish the importance of the divine nature of Jesus to fit their secular creed.

 

 

 

See also
Should we intervene to prevent suicide? >> more
Divorce risk indicator >> more
When you feel like you're sharing a bed with a stranger >> more
Surving the breakup >> more
Suicide terrorism as a desperate weapon of liberation >> more
Ned Flanders — popular face of Christianity >> more
Seven common myths about religion >> more
Moral divide between church leaders and laity >> more
Unholy silence over MPs hypocrisy and greed >> more
Anglican schism over gay clergy inevitable >> more
My agonising path to enlightenment >> more
More than ever, it's a time for generosity >> more
National's ethics smell of political expediency >> more
Pope's trip to Holy Land fraught with potholes >> more
The resurrection may have been superfluous >> more
Rasputin — from sinner and seducer to saint? >> more
Religious delusions and the Jerusalem syndrome >> more
Protest mild compared with Jesus' vandalism >> more
What Castro and Obama have in common >> more
Holidays can revive romance or widen cracks between couples >> more
Dubious scholarship reinterprets Jesus to fit secular creed >> more
Furore over gay marriage echoes the conflict over slavery >> more
If only politics were as certain as dear old granny >> more
You've got to have faith to win the White House >> more
The problem of evil >> more
TV Programmers let lose Roman circus >> more
Prostitutes welcome in the kingdom of God but not in Dannevirke >> more
Church too busy navel-gazing to take lead over crime >> more
Will the Anglican Church split over gay clergy and same-sex unions? >> more
Faith in secular western society >> more
The Vatican's pelvic theology >> more
Abuse and the Beijing Olympics >> more
Would the real Jesus stand up? >> more
Hypersensitivity perverts ethics >> more
God and presidential hopefuls >> more
A three-ghetto church based on politics >> more
Good and bad intentions >> more
Deliver us from exorcists who harm >> more
How effective is prayer? >> more
Masters of non-violence, resistance and kung fu >> more
Was Mother Teresa living a lie? >> more
Double standards over child sex abuse >> more
Soppy inspirational and pseudo-spiritual emails >> more
Caring organisations and pyschopathic bosses >> more
The new anti-religious evangelists >> more
Call for religious education could backfire >> more
Blessing creatures great & small — but what about blowflies? >> more
Does God exist only in the brain? >> more
The Prudes who crucify >> more
tomb raiders and the bones of Jesus and his family? >> more
Jesus loves Osama >> more
Is God more like a matchbox or a number? >> more
Confessions of a failed axe murderer >> more
Bacchanalian festivals and sentimentality >> more
Manners: insignificant social customs? >> more
The 109 fighting boys >> more
Trying to exhume the historical Jesus >> more
Is global violence really on the increase? >> more
Polygamy, circumcision, atheist journalists and religious diversity >> more
The Christian Right stands by Israel out of a misguided theology  >> more 
What a rat taught me >> more
The Church is becoming a retirement hobby for granny clergy >> more 
Is there an anti-Christian conspiracy in Hollywood? >> more
Have church schools sold out on Christianity? >> more
How good a Christian is President George W Bush? >> more

Hitler, Lawyers, Politicians SUV owners and life after death >> more

Were the Christian hostages really idiots for peace? >> more
Infidelity: in hot pursuit of a better organsm or better intimacy? >> more
Skulduggery and controversy over discovery of religious texts >> more
The cartoons aren't about secular freedoms versus intolerance >> more

Christian Zionists hinder justice and peace in the Middle East >> more

Should making more money be your New Year's resolution? >> more
My early life as a black sheep in a nativity scene >> more
Different types of suicide bomber: what makes them tick >> more
Cheating a short cut to sucess in winner-take-all society >> more
Life after death: Is it logically possible? >> more
Is it Anglican to practise apartheid? >> more
Da Vinci Code unlocks controversy>> more
Bishops' statement: pompous, pious, out of touch and verging on the heretical >> more 
Church leaders unconvincing over prostitution law reform >> more
Divorce risk factors >> more
How global are we?  A Christian's view of globalisation >> more
Victims of dirty tricks & friendly fire: Machiavellian tactics in the Church militant >> more
A redundant resurrection >> more
War, violence, ethics, religion and hypocrisy >> more
If St Peter was interviewed for ordination today >> more
13 ways to empty a church without really trying >> more
How tolerant is the Museum of Tolerance? >> more
A church comes out and reconciliation divides >> more
Micah's dream — too much to ask? >> more
Has the revised Anglican Church in New Zealand instigated a benign form of religious apartheid? >> more
The case for St Judas Iscariot >> more
Exorcism: the ministry of deliverance >> more

Top